Build, modernize and run software that scales

Yes, and it is the more common request. We begin with a two to three week assessment covering architecture, test coverage, dependency risk and delivery workflow, then propose a stabilise first plan. Rewrites are recommended only where the cost of maintaining the current system genuinely exceeds the cost of replacing it.

Most clients start with a fixed price discovery and architecture phase, then move to a dedicated pod billed monthly. A pod typically includes a tech lead, engineers, a QA specialist and part time architecture and delivery support, scaled to the roadmap rather than to a fixed template. Our engagement and pricing FAQ sets out how contracts, notice periods and support tiers work.

Security controls sit inside the delivery pipeline: dependency and secret scanning on every merge, OWASP aligned reviews, least privilege infrastructure and environment isolation. For regulated clients we map controls to the relevant framework and produce the audit evidence as part of normal delivery.

We use the strangler fig pattern: new functionality is built alongside the monolith and traffic moves across route by route behind a facade. Each step is independently reversible, so a problem in one slice never forces a full rollback and the business keeps trading throughout. The data behind that system usually needs the same treatment, which is what our data modernization services cover.

You do, from the first commit. Work happens in your repositories where possible, under your branching and review conventions. Infrastructure is defined as code and handed over with runbooks so there is no dependency on us to deploy, scale or recover the system.